this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
1414 points (98.6% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

5537 readers
1754 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cross posted from Discuit

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] plz1@lemmy.world 107 points 2 days ago (5 children)

It's kind of scary that 3 weeks is all it took for them to list their home.

[–] biscuit@lemdro.id 2 points 1 day ago

It just kinda proves to me that the story is most likely bullshit, or they were always planning to sell the house.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 108 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It’s kind of scary that 3 weeks is all it took for them to list their home.

The neighbor is part of the (in 2019) 51%.

"Most Working Americans Would Face Economic Hardship If They Missed More than One Paycheck"

source

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And on top of that for most government workers their paychecks have been remarkably stable. Assuming you'll always be employed plus easy credit and bad financial habits are a bad combination

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Pretty much this. For many, up until basically right now, working in the federal government all but guaranteed employment for years. I tried very, very hard to be employed at my local NIOSH branch (sadly didn't make the cut) because of this fact.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Man, that's tragic. I was poor most of my early life, and when I finally started to make enough money to be comfortable, I knew that the thing I couldn't do was fall into the lifestyle trap. Living well below my means saved me so much hardship when things weren't going well. I know that many don't ever get to the point of comfortable, though, and there's a bit of luck and effort, to that.

[–] techclothes@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wish we could do that. Renting and buying houses today makes it incredibly difficult to live very far below your means.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Oh for sure. I had one good run with a company that went public. I leveraged that into long term investments rather than buying expensive stuff I didn't need.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bet he also had a $100k truck parked in front of that home. Bought with a loan with 12% interest

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

12% is pretty insane for an asset that depreciates as fast as a vehicle does.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My first car had a 23% interest rate on the loan. I had no credit history and was relying on people I thought knew enough about car buying with me to help me know if I was getting shafted. That dealership has remained on my do not buy list ever since, even after changing ownership due to the previous owners practices of fraud

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's such a sham that the "truth in lending" laws still didn't go far enough to simplify the Financials of loan interest.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly the biggest problem was not that I wasn't shown the interest rate, but that they carefully avoided any financial talk (I never actually saw the final price of the vehicle, only the monthly payment and only learned the exact details, including the several extra thousand dollars of extended service plans when I was going to refinance the loan at my bank) and carefully flipped through the paperwork to encourage jumping straight to signing without reading, even joking "oh no you don't want to read that" at one stage

Every car I've bought since I've been extremely diligent to read through all of the paperwork before signing anything, and one of the times caught the permission to sell data for marketing purposes form which I declined (the salesperson seemed surprised when I spotted that one and said "oh that looks like one to decline")

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

yeah that's my point. the truth in lending laws don't cover that level of obfuscation, so that monthly payment hides the actual burden in one small omission.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Because cars are status symbols and people are fucking stupid. So of course capitalists exploit these dumdums. There are even companies where you can rent-to-own tire rims. And of course those companies make hundreds of millions a year.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

If their whole financial system is built on getting the next paycheck or else, this is quite to be expected. He might even be smart (for a magahead) putting it on the market as early as possible instead of clinging to it.

[–] blueeggsandyam@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Doesn’t seem likely unless he was renting. Even if you miss one mortgage payment, your bank can’t take your house that fast. If he was renting, he might have been threatened with eviction and chose to leave.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Doesn’t seem likely unless he was renting. Even if you miss one mortgage payment, your bank can’t take your house that fast.

If it was posted for sale it likely wasn't a foreclosure that fast. Perhaps the owner did the math and saw very quickly that they wouldn't be able to keep up with the mortgage, or no longer had any reason to live in that city because they were there only for the job. With the job gone, the need of the house in that city goes with it. I'm just speculating.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Honestly might just be that, especially if they were working in DC proper.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Well if he was renting, his house being up for sale wouldn't really matter.