this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
351 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38322 readers
334 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please more!!!!!!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Aand still +30% from year ago.

Is "Tesla is going bankrupt" then new "Putin has cancer"?

[–] PeteZa@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Trump apparently tried claiming it’s illegal to boycott Tesla. They’re most likely not happy about it lol

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.funami.tech 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The entire stock market is likely overvalued by 25% or so. This is a regression to the mean, accelerated by the fact that Musk no longer seems to care whether Tesla is successful or not. Probably because he sucked out all the money via that incentive package the board approved a few months ago.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The pay was in stock options. It essentially doubled his ownership of Tesla from 12% to 25% so he in fact cares a lot about the price.

The stockholders are definitely morons for agreeing to it. Pay the fashgeld and you never get rid of the fash.

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.funami.tech 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I didn't know that, thank you! Also apparently a judge has blocked the awarding of the package?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes, we'll see if it sticks. The prior argument was that Elon effectively controlled the board, and when he convinced the shareholders to vote in favor as well he lied/threatened them and invalidated it. This is just cynicism but I wouldn't particularly expect that to stick, but who knows?

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.funami.tech 2 points 17 hours ago

Maybe the judges will think of the poor shareholders for once