this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
42 points (95.7% liked)

Games

36517 readers
1365 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I have to disagree.

To play with these brands in the LEGO ecosystem is fantastic for me and the kid. We really enjoy the cross overs you can make, and LEGO makes sure everything fits.

But if LEGO didnt make "OG content", I would agree. But they do.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Ninjago is still going strong after like what? 10 years? And it's a pretty good theme with all kinds of badass builds and part usage. City has never not been a thing since it's creation, and we're still regularly getting modulars every year since like 2005. Lego is still churning out tons of their original stuff: the new Neo Space, Dreamzzz, Friends, the aforementioned Ninjago.

Sure they're making more and more licensed stuff, but I'd honestly "blame" Dimensions and people as a whole. Who else would want to see Lego Ghostbusters or Pokemon or Sonic interact with each other? Fans of those franchises, that's who. Lego is just giving people what they want.

Idk why this was a whole rant, but hey.