this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
71 points (77.1% liked)

Asklemmy

46606 readers
778 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/27293783

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Still doesn't really solve the problem of candidates being pre-approved for the bourgeoisie.

[โ€“] Madbrad200@sh.itjust.works -2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Don't let imperfection get in the way of progress. If you move slightly towards the left, you're opening doors for more left ideology.

[โ€“] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 hours ago

I think I'd agree with you more if I believed "pushing for XYZ" was a valid strategy for implementing structures opening the door for progress in a system dominated by those who benefit from the status quo. Without that belief, I turn to other historically succesful methods of gaining change, like millitant labor organizing and revolution.