this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
610 points (99.4% liked)

People Twitter

6423 readers
1551 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 20 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (4 children)

I've had people, presumably young, argue with me on here about politics and morals. For example, I say the right to abortion is a political issue. Been screamed out that it's not a political issue because a woman's right to an abortion is a moral issue. Yeah, I agree, but the argument is still political. Some believe abortion is murder and that they're right. That's politics.

It's like they have no sense that other views exist, and opposing views do not constitute politics. "I'm on the right side of this thing so it's not politics!" As if I'm somehow lowering the debate to mere... something?

That was one of the first things I got confused by on lemmy. Am I making sense? Just crawled in from work and I'm wasted tired.

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 9 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

The owning class wants to be the only class doing politics. So they brainwash the proles into thinking politics is bad.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 24 minutes ago

not just bad, but extremely venal, petty, and a thing that happens in marble rooms you aren't allowed to go in.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 9 points 4 hours ago

And making people believe preserving the status quo is not political but changing it is

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 4 hours ago

It's also a health issue. It involves choices about life, not unlike someone in a coma or another situation where they are unable to make a conscious choice about whether to continue or deny treatment.

One argument in favor of abortion I recall reading was comparing it to donating an organ while you're still alive. You are under no obligation of donating anything, of risking your life to save another, even if you are literally the only person on Earth that can save the other. If medical professionals have to respect those choices, they should also respect the choice of mothers who decide to end an undesired pregnancy

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 12 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

But they are moral arguments, unless politics is added into the discussion. Let me give you a different example. If I believe people are entitled to the fruits of their labor then that's a moral point. If I believe the government should enforce everyone getting their fruits, that's political.

If I were to believe abortion is wrong then that can be a moral point. However if I think the government should take a stand on the matter, that's political.

[–] brognak@lemm.ee 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The point they were trying to make (I believe, and this specific argument) is that the entire basis of the opposing argument is entirely based on religion and pretty much by definition specious. There is no sky daddy looking over your shoulder, and this any morality you base on its existence is inheritetly flawed at best.

What there is are women who need timely access to medical care or their lives are at risk. This is a tangible and real threat.

So treating the issue as "Politics" only serves to dignify the flawed morality of one side while letting women die.

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 1 points 5 hours ago

So treating the issue as "Politics" only serves to dignify the flawed morality of one side while letting women die.

Your earlier paragraphs don't provide any evidence for this point.