this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
913 points (98.7% liked)

World News

45373 readers
4348 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LuckyPierre@lemm.ee 74 points 3 days ago (45 children)

Elsewhere on Lemmy today;

Germany warns Russia may be preparing attack on NATO

Both of these cannot be true.

[–] TThor@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago

They can be true. They might be low on current stockpile, but what is building up is production capacity. Preparing to attack doesn't mean immediately attacking, what most have concern is that once Russia's war against Ukraine cools down, Russia will spend the next 4-10 years building up towards potentially attacking NATO nations.

Yes, years down the line doesn't sound as alarming to the layman, but it is critical for that eventuality to be recognized and prepared for, nations and industry move slowly, and they need to prepare to fight another long drawn out war.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 64 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The idea is that after some kind of cease fire, russia will churn out stuff for 3-4-5 years (so mebbe 1.000 tanks?) and then not go full frontal against NATO but say take a bite out of Lithuania, just to see what the response will be.

Like they have been doing since forever (Chechnya, Moldavia, Georgia, Ukraine and so on).

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Correct. The issue with Ukraine though is they fought back and didn't give any land to Russia. Now Putin needs to save face and how many people put through the meat grinder to do that is irrelevant.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Irrelevant to Putin. It matters a lot to Europe and Ukraine.

[–] tauren@lemm.ee 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Both things can be true because Germany is talking about risks in the upcoming 5 to 10 years, while this issue is relevant today.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago

There are ways Russia can attack that doesn’t include massive tank charges

[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We have to keep in mind that Europe needs to justify austerity for the citizens and rearmament for their militaries. I have no evidence of this, but I think it's an entierly sensible read that the warning from Germany is an overstatement with that intent in mind.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

I guess you need to pretend there's a threat NOW in order to divert funds towards defense now.

If the threat is in more like 10 years, why don't we start investing next year instead? etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They absolutely can.

Russia has thousands of men willing to fight in horrendous conditions.

A few thousand soldiers that are very well equipped might lose to 10x as many badly equipped enemies.

I think they would lose, but they might not think so.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I still can’t believe how fucking shameless their regime is with those “prizes”. Like… holy fuck.

[–] barryamelton@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's about search engine squatting, if you now search "Russia meatgrinder" you get that, instead of articles about losing the war.

Lmfao this is hilariously logical and I bet it’s actually the reason

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I mean it is so ridiculous on so many levels but also the gifts themselves are so absurd. If some of their high up elites just skipped a single dinner, they could probably buy something that is worth 10x more. The ruling class became so addicted to their money that they can't even sacrifice a minute fraction of it for proper propaganda lol.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Russia has thousands of men willing to fight in horrendous conditions.

They've got hundreds of thousands of conscripts who are largely dug in along an enormous front, along the four eastern most seized Oblasts in Ukraine.

Any attack they would make into a NATO state would be an artillery bombardment intended to deny Ukrainians resupply, not a ground invasion to secure territory. Particularly not when they have poor control over their own borders and a nasty instance of counter-insurgence popping up in and around their major cities.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

If you know anything about current Russian government, you'd know that one necessarily follows the other. The more desperate Russia gets, the less reserves they have, the more bold and aggressive they're getting. There is a combination of factors leading into it, both psychological and material.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Everything written about this conflict (by anyone) is propaganda. The enemy is a powerful and maximally oppressive force we all need to fear, but is also so weak it's losing equipment fast and its final defeat is only a matter of time.

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I was told that russia was bankrupt and the war would be over in 3 months. And then when that wagner guy revolted, it was the final nail in the coffin

Yet here we are and the war is still on.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

It's not our fault you have been badly informed.

Everyone knows the russian economy is on the ropes for example, but when will it crack? No one knows.

[–] rice@lemmy.org 10 points 3 days ago

Yea I remember the videos of all the civilian cars being delivered via trains because "russia was out of military vehicles" like 5 months after it started

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

when that wagner guy revolted, it was the final nail in the coffin

What was crazy during the Wagner Revolt was the intransigence of the Ukraine line.

You'd think that would be the moment for a full press by Ukraine troops over a lightly defended border. But no... they just stayed put and watched Prigovian flounder.

[–] seeigel@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The Partnership: The Secret History of the War in Ukraine https://lemmy.world/post/27574354

NYT article explains it.

[–] Robbity@lemm.ee 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Have you never worked in an organization?

You can have as many preparation meetings as you want and still be on your ass when the day of judgement comes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wtckt@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Taking over a Baltic state is feasible. NATO might react by sending helmets and prayers.

[–] seeigel@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Artikel 42 EU treaty. All members of the EU have to fight with their full capacity. This will escalate quickly.

There are already EU troops in the Baltics, just to remind the Russans of it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 days ago

Russia wouldn't exactly not try, but they have a very 19th century realpolitik take everything and exploit the fuck out of it approach. I would have said that's silly. now, not so sure it isn't working

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 7 points 3 days ago

They can flood the Baltics with drones and cause plenty of chaos and destruction.

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

Russia is still ramping up military production on a wartime economy, to be used after the Ukrainians stop fighting back. Also their production focuses on their modern options for land and air. I don't know what their naval production is doing.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Who said the attack would be with conventional armed forces?

[–] Iceman@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

German security officials believe the Kremlin is laying the groundwork for a potential large-scale conventional war with NATO by the end of the decade, according to multiple reports cited by European Pravda and Bild.

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/germany-warns-russia-may-be-preparing-attack-on-nato/

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago
  • We're on the verge of total victory

  • The enemy is prepared to launch its biggest attack yet

Is the same war time propaganda we've been served up for decades. Iraq/Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Kosovo, Vietnam, Korea...

The news coverage is totally divorced from what is happening on the ground. There's even a term for it.

Credibility Gap

load more comments (29 replies)