this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
561 points (96.7% liked)

World News

45455 readers
5063 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A new Innofact poll shows 55% of Germans support returning to nuclear power, a divisive issue influencing coalition talks between the CDU/CSU and SPD.

While 36% oppose the shift, support is strongest among men and in southern and eastern Germany.

About 22% favor restarting recently closed reactors; 32% support building new ones.

Despite nuclear support, 57% still back investment in renewables. The CDU/CSU is exploring feasibility, but the SPD and Greens remain firmly against reversing the nuclear phase-out, citing stability and past policy shifts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] torrentialgrain@lemm.ee 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Even before nuclear power was the most expensive type in the energy mix iirc.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 12 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

We're not saving the world by always choosing the cheapest option, that's how we got here

[–] Thadrax@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

No one is talking about building new coal plants or similar. Comparing good low carbon options, nuclear is still very expensive.

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world -1 points 14 hours ago

Exactly. If you only go by kw/euro spent then you end up tearing down wind turbines to expand coal mines which Germany has already done.

If you go by the actual environmental cost and sustainability, specifically carbon use and land use ar square meter/kw, nuclear becomes so "cheap" you have to ask if anyone who is opposed to it cares about future generations still having a habitable planet and living in a civilization that hasn't collapse into the pre-industrial.

We need nuclear to be the backbone of our future same as we need wind and solar as renewables to supplement and offer quick expansion and coverage of energy needs as our demands continue to rise.

[–] glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

yes even coal is "cheaper" than nuclear once you disregard polution

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 hours ago

once you disregard polution

Including radioactive waste, which coal produces significantly more of than fission power.