this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
618 points (96.7% liked)

World News

45455 readers
3882 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A new Innofact poll shows 55% of Germans support returning to nuclear power, a divisive issue influencing coalition talks between the CDU/CSU and SPD.

While 36% oppose the shift, support is strongest among men and in southern and eastern Germany.

About 22% favor restarting recently closed reactors; 32% support building new ones.

Despite nuclear support, 57% still back investment in renewables. The CDU/CSU is exploring feasibility, but the SPD and Greens remain firmly against reversing the nuclear phase-out, citing stability and past policy shifts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Fukushima's reactors were extremely old, even at the time. We're not even talking about the same technology. Shit has come a very long way.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, and the next catastrophe will have some good reason too, yet it will happen due to human error and greed.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Unlike the complete safety of fossil fuels.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Because everyone knows there's literally only fossil fuels and nuclear energy, nothing else.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Cool, so continue to pretend that you didn't see the chart in this very thread? Here it is again:

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

There is more to the calculation of risk than just looking at this data. You know very well how large the impact of individual disasters is.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That must be why you people are suggesting to turn the extremely old German reactors back on that have had limited maintenance under the assumption that they would be turned off for decades now.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 17 hours ago

That must be why you people are suggesting to turn the extremely old German reactors back on

Is that what I did? Well that's news to me!