this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
1363 points (99.3% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2881 readers
1164 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/28140949

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

You should have some sympathy for Musk, since apparently you also like to talk out of your ass without looking into it.

https://aah-inc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/whomeless.pdf

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I work serving the homeless. We spent $10 billion for one year during COVID just to include all of the students who didn't already get free school meals to have it during that time. Unless you're only providing cots and Porto-johns, that number might work as an annual figure, until inflation hits, or the numbers go up because once you offer free housing, more people will try to become eligible.

Sounds to me like you're the one talking out your ass.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Then present your data. Hell, publish your data. If you know better than the experts at HUD, and can prove it, it should be quite the boon to your career.

But you’re not wrong that band-aids for systemic problems are much more expensive than solving them.

[–] turnip@lemm.ee 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Most free housing doesnt allow drugs, which is the main problem homeless people have with living in them.

Then you have the general maintenance issues, fire risk, nimbyism. Is it really that simple?

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You’re perpetuating capitalist propaganda. Most homeless people do not have a drug problem. At least half of homeless people in the US are employed.

It’s not a drug problem. It’s an unaffordable housing problem.

[–] turnip@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Ah, that could very well be true, we really printed a lot of money during Covid. In Canada the government is already buying 50% of all mortgage bonds, inflating the debt people can take in order to juice home prices.

[–] Brosplosion@lemm.ee 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

These numbers are extremely unsubstantiated. If you think giving someone $40k will permanently save them from homelessness I have a bridge to sell you.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Let’s see your study. What do you know that HUD experts don’t?

People also said you can’t solve homelessness by giving them homes, and Finland did it with ease.

[–] Brosplosion@lemm.ee 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

For example, California spent over $24 billion over a period of five years and didn't even make a dent.

Homelessness is not a simple problem you can just throw money at. People will consistently fall through the societal cracks.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Yes, California’s half-assed efforts have been rife with fraud and waste.

https://calmatters.org/housing/homelessness/2024/04/california-homelessness-spending

Similarly, it costs many billions more to fund our half-assed healthcare system than it would be to simply give people healthcare. Dealing with problems in a way that only attacks the symptoms is far more expensive and wasteful.

But it has been proven that guaranteeing housing is both cheaper and produces superior results.

https://pulitzercenter.org/stories/look-finlands-housing-first-initiative

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 16 hours ago

If you can provide six months of housing, food and support then a person could start earning for themselves. You don't have to provide a lifetime of help for $40,000