this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
220 points (99.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6395 readers
260 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I have 30km there and 30km back from the from the shops on country roads. An electric car seems a safer and more practical way to encourage a change in my circumstances.

[–] 8uurg@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

That is only really a good solution for the few that live in the countryside. If sufficiently many people live close enough to one another without a shop, that is a issue that is best solved by improving planning and introducing local shops (reducing the distance all people in the community have to travel).

[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago

Old mate commented before reading the headline 💀💀💀

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You do you, other people live in the city

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is also a social engineering aspect. Our populations and cities have been developed in a spread out fashion with services and shops established in hubs. They aren’t the villages of the early 1900s. The car was the major design influence, hence the problem. Some people are lucky and can walk, others are able to cycle however many just can’t conceive anything other than a car. That’s where EVs come in.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't see how that's relevant but yes

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The relevance is the difficulty in convincing people who live in cities designed for car traffic to stop driving and start walking. Distances are large enough to get significant push back.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The cities need a glow up first. But it's more than just an infrastructure problem. To my knowledge there's no laws requiring grocery store chains to not have a monopoly or not be hella far away