politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Doesn't need to be more. Most of what China imports from the US is relatively easy to source from elsewhere. For example the biggest category of imports is fuel, and the third biggest category is plant based oils, grains, seeds, fruits, etc. The US doesn't have a particular monopoly on those kinds of products. Last time this shit happened, China started sourcing all their soy bean imports from Brazil, for example. So China only has to make the US products uncompetitive in their market. And of course, China isn't in a trade war with the entirety of the rest of the planet, so it's a choice between an 84% tariff, or something in the region of no tariffs, so it doesn't really take all that much to make the US product more expensive than any other option. If anything, these additional tariffs are largely performative; just at the 34% percent level they were at, most US producers were probably already completely shut out of Chinese markets just by cost differences alone.
The US, on the other hand, largely imports things that China is highly specialised at making. Electronics, injection molded plastics, that sort of thing. Stuff that you can't just magically source from somewhere else, because even if another factory could make the product, they have to set up production runs, create specific tooling, run prototype batches, etc, etc. So even at a 100% markup, a lot of companies will have no choice but to continue to source those parts from China, especially since anywhere else they might have them built is probably also subject to an exorbitant tariff. The cost of importing from China isn't actually 104%, it's 104% minus the tariff one whatever other country you might get that part from. Trump's deranged theory is that they're going to choose between 104% vs 0% for making it in the US, but there simply aren't any production facilities in the US that are set up to make the stuff that China makes, so that choice doesn't exist.
(in case you're wondering about the second biggest category, since I obviously skipped it, it's machinery, including engines, turbines, nuclear reactors, boilers, taps, valves, etc. That's the sort of thing that's harder to source elsewhere, but in the long run China is much better equipped to start producing it domestically because they at least have the kind of broad manufacturing base needed. It'll hurt them, but not nearly as much as this stuff is hurting the US, and they can also issue specific exemptions if needed).