this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
491 points (99.0% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

2346 readers
200 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
PugJesus@lemmy.world
PugJesus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
491
Always remember to flex on your disciples (lemmy.world)
submitted 6 days ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/historymemes@lemmy.world
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As often said, no academic argues Jesus was not a historical figure. Only militant terminally online atheists do.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I'm not talking about whether Jesus existed or not. The bible is not a historic accord is what I'm saying.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 3 points 6 days ago

Got you, no argument against that

[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Still, Simon/Peter could just as fine be as real as the person historically named Jesus. Assuming Jesus wasn't talking to imaginary friends all day.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 1 points 6 days ago

That’s not their point. Their point is the Bible isn’t a reliable source.