this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
566 points (99.1% liked)

World News

45678 readers
2218 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If I'm not mistaken, the US spends more on military than the rest of NATO combined. How do you imagine a military engagement against the US would end for us?

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Poorly but the US would lose like the loser country they are. MFs couldn't win against Vietnam or Afghan peasants.

[–] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 15 points 3 days ago

It doesn't quite feel right for other countries have to send their citizens to fight and die against a former ally just because American citizens can't hold their government accountable.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That’s because Americans could not stomach killing enough innocent people to win the war like we had in previous wars. The US military could have depopulated Afghanistan if the citizens of the US would have permitted it.

If an invading army is attacking America there’s little reason to believe the citizens wouldn’t be ok with killing every invader.

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

depopulate is a pretty weird way to say “genocide”….

i, from my armchair, think it’s more about “hearts and minds”… as in, according to the us army guerilla warfare handbook, a guerilla army is impossible to defeat if they are well supported by the populace.

they can always disappear into someone’s home, and can always get new supplies….
well, unless you genocide the entire country….

depopulate is a pretty weird way to say “genocide”….

Genocides suggest that people remain and/or suggests killing a single ethnic group. Depopulate means killing everyone. The choice of “depopulate” was intentional as I believe had the US military wanted to they had enough ordinance to kill literally everything in Afghanistan and Iraq.