politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
RIP Pax Americana.
That's what scares me. We had two things; banking and the military. Now all we've got is weapons.
When all you've got is weapons
....
Uhh something something hammer nails
I am hoping the F35 was enough of a earth tilting catastrophe that a lot of the dangerous violent competent military potential of the flailing US oligarchy and already was siphoned off into good old corruption.
It sounds like hyperbole but when you start to look at the numbers, it is like a whole war was fought where winning involved burning a civilization toppling amount of money on a dysfunctional weapon.
The program has definitely had issues but the F-35 is a very effective aircraft, nothing on the "market" as it were even comes close. There's a reason they're selling well internationally despite their cost. (at least, they were selling well)
It's worth mentioning that a lot of the negative rhetoric surrounding the F-35 originated from Pierre Sprey, who was a fucking idiot with a chip on his shoulder at best or a Russian asset at worst.
That is fair but the cost is insane, and you have to rely on the US not being insane.
Overall though, the costs were worth it. We can produce (or used to be able to produce before tariffs) F35s cheaper than rival European fighters that don’t even have stealth capabilities at a lower cost at a faster rate.
This isn't a cool military video game where you compare stats between units and nerd out about it, that money could have gone to providing people in the U.S. a future and that future is gone forever now.
Those costs became salaries and paid engineers and skilled tradespeople, lawyers and financiers, auditors and test pilots, illustrators and modelors, janitors and security guards, truck drivers and inventory specialists, logisticians and mathmericians, scientists and metallurgists, flight doctors and software developers... and on, and on, and on - it may be one of the single biggest job creating programs in the USA in a Generation. That money also got routed into mutual funds and 401k's and into the communities where all those people live and work. While there are certainly more noble and more effective uses for money, the F35 program has provided a living for a great many people.
That amount of money could have provided those people a future instead of a job that paid well for a bit.
It's high but the point was to spread the cost over it being the single plane for all of NATO with all countries buying it. Problem now is Trump being an idiot and people are backing out.
No, the problem is the program spent an obsene amount of money, just because you also can no longer trust the people controlling the program doesn't mean the program wasn't a titanic, strategic faceplant of burning so much money that any future conflict is already lost.
longer response
...but also, this is what military nerds seem to refuse to understand about this, you can't act like it is a detail that maybe now you can't existentially trust the person you are buying an incredibly advanced fighter aircraft from, as if that wasn't directly connected to why the f35 itself is a strategic failure of a program, and as if there is any sense that you can consider the f35 separately from the incredibly incompetent politics and runaway cancerous military industrial complex surrounding it.I will concede maybe I was being overly negative about the capabilities of the plane, but this whole conversation is still absolutely absurd, we might as well be arguing about comic book super heroes if we aren't going to include the context of this program was CLEARLY a strategic failure for everyone involved from the beginning, because the existential risk to the security of other nations at the highest levels is now threatened (sureee the U.S. military can't hack their own jets.... ..... ....).
The f35 is meant to be a lynchpin of an integrated battlefield, collating, identifying and tracking targets. It is like you took all the corporate surveillance of a microsoft 11 laptop and made it into a fighter jet, it is constantly gobbling up, receiving, and sending data... which is exactly what makes it such a powerful asset... but need I remind you... looks over at the dumpsterfire that is the U.S. it was designed over there.
Honestly, I would be very surprised if the f35 didn't have multiple kill switches purposefully built into the design from agencies that actually have no idea the other agency or entity also put a killswitch into the f35. I don't know if I believe any single person actually knows all of the backdoors that were essentially designed into the aircraft.
Why wouldn't the plane be an endless hallway of backdoors for U.S. military industrial interests and intelligence agencies? Every creator of weapons of war since the first weapon would do the same thing if they had the chance and didn't care about the consequences (the U.S. clearly does not care about the consequences if you haven't noticed).
As evidence: see any modern smartphone, computer, car, tractor, tv or other electronic device "from" the U.S. and imagine if any time somebody started asking difficult questions to the greedy person in charge they could pump up their toxic masculinity and attack them back with "THIS is a serious matter of national security".
Additionally something that national security staff at many major allies of the U.S. right now have to be thinking is that nobody really knows how much information has been accessed by completely untrustuable, unvetted or people proven already to be untrustworthy in the Trump administration, this is a strategic intelligence failure up and down the entire breadth and width of the U.S. military empire since potentially ANY of the information from ANY of the people that are crucial to making all of that stuff function.... well somebody might know their address now might they?
I don't relish this, this is bad, I am just being honest.
You've got to imagine that if the US somehow got into a shooting war with a country they had previously sold arms to, and it were possible to remotely disable their aircraft, that someone in the MIC would say, "Hold on. If we use this kill switch, the world will see it and literally no countries will ever buy weapons from us again."
You are going to tell that to me with a straight face lol?
It's not an accident that in an era where every single part of the US budget is being gutted (or likely to be gutted before all of this is over with), the Pentagon received an enormous increase. The MIC runs the US. If the CEO of Lockheed Martin makes a call to Trump, you had better believe Trump listens closely.
The pentagon has been growing like an out of control cancer since at least 9/11, this doesn't prove that.
I am sorry, do you still at this late date think Trump listens? Even if he wanted to, he wouldn't know how he hasn't done it in decades.
My guy, the fact that you can't have a friendly discussion without immediately down voting every response indicates that someguy3 is probably right
Your longer response just shows me that you are emotionally attached to raging against the machine. There no point is conversing. A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still.
AFAIK it's essentially untested. The only way to test it would be to use it in a real shooting war against an enemy who can shoot back. The war in Ukraine has showed that a lot of assumptions about how a war would play out are wrong. It may be that the F-35 can be defeated by a few $500 drones, and is essentially useless in a war.
But her emails!