DeGoogle Yourself

11219 readers

189 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

Be respectful even in disagreement
No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.
No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

!privacyguides@lemmy.one !privacy@lemmy.ml !privatelife@lemmy.ml !linuxphones@lemmy.ml !fossdroid@social.fossware.space !fdroid@lemmy.ml

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml

CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee

Byereddithellolemmy@lemmy.world

chevy9294@monero.town

184

Getting unhappy about DuckDuckGo (lemmy.ca)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by pglpm@lemmy.ca to c/degoogle@lemmy.ml

101 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For several years I've been using DuckDuckGo instead of Google Search, and I've been overall quite happy with the results. Only rarely had I to resort to Google search (!g).

During the last month or two, however, I've found myself using the !g switch and Google search more than half of the time. DuckDuckGo shows no or few results where Google shows more (and useful) ones.

Still I don't want to give in. So:

Have you also experienced this worsening of DuckDuckGo?
Which other more privacy-respecting alternatives do you recommend?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Commiunism@beehaw.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Searx is good enough if you set up plenty of engines - I do look up quite a lot of stuff and not once in the past 3 months did I go "yeah I need to use google for this".

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm trying SearX today, after so many recommended it. It looks promising! Thank you for pointing out the multiple-engines setup.

One possible drawback: it seems I can't do "verbatim" searches; or at least, quotation marks don't seem to lead to verbatim searches – I'll try with "+". DDG was adamant with quotation marks, that's something I liked a lot about it.

[–] Commiunism@beehaw.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interesting, verbatim searches work perfectly for me. Maybe it's some search engine that doesn't support them? I personally have bing/google/duckduckgo selected.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago

No, I stand corrected: the summary/snippet wasn't showing some of the quoted search words, but the page had all of them. Well done SearXNG.