DeGoogle Yourself

11219 readers

146 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

Be respectful even in disagreement
No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.
No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

!privacyguides@lemmy.one !privacy@lemmy.ml !privatelife@lemmy.ml !linuxphones@lemmy.ml !fossdroid@social.fossware.space !fdroid@lemmy.ml

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml

CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee

Byereddithellolemmy@lemmy.world

chevy9294@monero.town

184

Getting unhappy about DuckDuckGo (lemmy.ca)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by pglpm@lemmy.ca to c/degoogle@lemmy.ml

102 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For several years I've been using DuckDuckGo instead of Google Search, and I've been overall quite happy with the results. Only rarely had I to resort to Google search (!g).

During the last month or two, however, I've found myself using the !g switch and Google search more than half of the time. DuckDuckGo shows no or few results where Google shows more (and useful) ones.

Still I don't want to give in. So:

Have you also experienced this worsening of DuckDuckGo?
Which other more privacy-respecting alternatives do you recommend?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I use DDG and can't say I've had an uptick in the amount of !g I have to do. The only one recently was for an image search but that's pretty normal when looking for something obscure.

Don't have any solutions, but figured another input might be interesting.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

It's very likely to depend on the kinds of searches I do, indeed. Although I think it's the same as in the previous years. Could also be just a subjective impression, so I'll try to keep count of how often the "!g" really leads to better results.