this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
61 points (95.5% liked)

Canada

9498 readers
974 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is it safe to say that casual use of the notwithstanding clause has been normalized to the point that there are no real consequences to invoking it any more?

[–] ninthant@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The burden is on people who understand what the notwithstanding clause means to explain to the less educated how dangerous this game is.

Do any of your friends and family know what this clause means? Every time I bring up the topic outside of politically active circles, I get a blank stare.

This proposal is illustrative to what’s at stake here. I’ll write an opinion piece on this later today.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I wouldn't say that's the case. Doug Ford got huge push-back for using it, to the point he repealed a piece of legislation that invoked it. Similarly, I don't think Poilievre would experience "no real consequences".

Plus, as pointed out in the article, "The clause can only override certain sections of the charter." IANAL, but I'm sure this (and Poilievre's other proposals to invoke the clause) will be reviewed by the courts.