this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
65 points (100.0% liked)

Hacker News

1975 readers
413 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Working as well and being secure are two different things. Smart devices are computers that connect to the Internet, and devices that no longer receive security updates are attack vectors.

From a SecOps standpoint, it's perfectly reasonable to block such devices from hitting your servers.

These thermostats still work as thermostats, you just can't use the cloud service.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

From a SecOps standpoint, it's perfectly reasonable to block such devices from hitting your servers.

Then they should give users a way to replicate the lost features on their own server. That'd be the user's own risk.

I know that no company does that. Doesn't make it right.

Don't buy IoT bullshit, kids.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

TP-link does. My Kasa devices work completely locally.

Also, you can get (certain) dirt cheap Tuya based devices and flash tasmota on it. Esphome is also a possibility.

I build most of my own smart devices, though.

[–] gadfly1999@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I see you’re getting downvoted but it’s a reasonable take. I fired from the hip thinking this was like most IoT garbage these days that is bricked without a connection to the server.