461
Elizabeth Warren Marks 100 Days Of Trump By Reading Aloud 100 Reports Of His Corruption
(www.huffpost.com)
this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
461 points (97.9% liked)
politics
23538 readers
2219 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If only she hadn't participated in the backstabbing of Bernie during the 2020 primaries, we night not be here.
This is what EVERYBODY doesn't understand: The DNC is NEVER going to select Bernie because he is NOT a Democrat. He is, and always has been, an Independant.
The presidential nomination is the highest award a party can give to a member, and they are going to give it to a loyal member who has supported the party, raised money for them, praised their actions, etc. Bernie has done none of that. He may caucus with the Dems, but he doesn't raise money for them, and he has often been very critical of Democrats.
He's NOT a Democrat, and there was never a time when the Democrats would give him the nomination, no matter how many votes he got in the primary. They wouldn't give him the nomination any more that they'd give it to a Republican.
Idk, he came close in 2016, we could probably get AOC if a lot more than 30 Million people participated in the primary.
Yeah seriously. Bernie would have solved everything. AOC 2028!
Lol whut? Bernie Sanders lost the 2020 DNC primary by 10 Million Votes, it was 19,080,074 Biden to 9,680,121 Bernie. Even if you add in Warren's 2,831,566 votes it wouldn't even bring Bernie close.
Arguing that the results of ratfuckery mean there was no ratfuckery is an interesting choice.
Also, there was only one active campaigning candidate when most of the country was even able to vote. Using the total of the entire election is idiotic when Biden was the only one running after the manufactured dropout scheme occurred
Listen if Bernies votes werent counted at all or if it were a really close race you might have a point but if 10 out of 35 million less people voted for your ass than the winner then you lost fair and square. Those votes are human beings who showed up and filled out a ballot.
Are you accusing Bernie Sanders of dropping out too early on purpose? He ran until April at which point the results were 62.9% to 31.7%.
So as long as they only cheated really really bad, and not shut him out altogether, it doesn't count?
The way the primaries are run are bullshit. That's not debatable. The same or so 12 states choose the candidate every time before most of the country can even voice their opinion. For the "Democratic" party. And then they wonder why no one is invested in a candidate they had no voice in deciding.
Biden wasn't even on the board in the first several states. Then they pulled their stunt with everyone dropping out at once to manufacture consent while keeping Warren in to split the progressive vote and somehow that means the guy who couldn't break top 3 is the clear choice? Utter bullshit. That got us the guy who couldn't be damned to even pretend to stand up against genocide, handing the election back to the worst candidate in history
I'm sorry that you thinking getting the most votes by more than double makes you a cheater.
I'm sorry that you think democracy is cheating.
The elections could be run better, no doubt, but it wouldn't have changed the outcome in the 2020 primaries.