this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
252 points (86.6% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

926 readers
1331 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Originally Posted By u/transcendent167 At 2025-05-02 10:43:07 AM | Source


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Using AI to make anti-billionaire media is ironic in a kind of satisfying way, honestly. Turn their weapons against them!

[–] KAtieTot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago

???? Bad argument for the use of AI.

Ai is shit. It makes shit. It's powered by precious fresh water and it wastes monumental amounts of electricity. And y'know, the massive amounts of theft.

All to what? Generate some soulless bullshit?

If you're making art to defy the rich, maybe actually make the fucking art yourself? Instead of making empty, lifeless facsimilies of resistance art?

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Unless it's run on a local machine, the billionaires are still getting money

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 6 points 1 day ago

User Numbers = Venture Capitalists. They don't need to see immediate profit to invest. They just need to see a user base and a feasible plan to make profit. See Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, InstaCart and most infamously MoviePass.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The billionaires are winning that battle, but losing the war. (Hopefully.)

Edit: If you can do $0.25 in billionaire economic damage with $0.10 in AI credits, you have won. I think this is entirely feasible, and simply needs scale.