this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
877 points (98.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6491 readers
372 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
877
The Myth of Plastic Recycling. (slrpnk.net)
submitted 2 days ago by Pro@programming.dev to c/climate@slrpnk.net
102 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] houseofleft@slrpnk.net 1 points 23 hours ago

I definitely get your point. I think it was pretty lousy wording from me to start with, and I should have said that those are pretty big levers to impact climate change rather than underplaying them as "slightly adressing".

I don't think any country has done enough, but countries that have put measures in place climate change are miles ahead of those that haven't. Compare New Zealand, or Sweden, to the USA.

To be clear as well, I'm not advocating incrementalism, I'm advocating that we do everything to adress climate change, and we're specifically talking about just one thing. Saying we shouldn't bother using the levers we have because they don't solve the whole problem is like saying you're not going to call the fire brigade because they won't get there in time to save the whole house.