this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
226 points (100.0% liked)

196

17030 readers
1271 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] starship_lizard@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (9 children)
[–] chalkman@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (46 children)

Hard-core authoritarian communist. The kinda peeps who support Stalin and shit

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 4 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Isn't "authoritarian communist" kind of an oxymoron? 😂 like the whole point of communism is that there isn't a ruling class. I guess Russia and China were never really communist, just statist authoritarian right? I mean, the Nazis called themselves Socialist. They were nowhere near that

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

Isn’t “authoritarian communist” kind of an oxymoron?

Yes. Yes, it is. I sometimes call them “pseudocommunists” for this reason.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Isn't "authoritarian communist" kind of an oxymoron?

Most real life implementations of communism used an authoritarian one party system. You can say these aren't true examples of communism, but that just ends up sounding like cope unfortunately.

[–] CrimsonOnoscopy@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

None of those states ever gave economic or political power to the working classes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Coryneform@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

well socialism has the proletariat as the ruling class, this is true in Marxism & anarchism even if anarchists word it differently

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (45 replies)
[–] limbo99@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's the prog-lib equivalent of woke. It's used dismiss leftists with out engaging with our arguments. The term has lite ideological or argumentative use.

[–] Darorad@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Libs use it that way, actual leftists use it to describe fascists that think they're on the left and like red flags.

load more comments (6 replies)