this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
107 points (96.5% liked)

World News

46460 readers
2492 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Because there isn't a trademark conflict, it's just too generic of a term to get trademarked in the first place, but it took seven months for USPTO to process the application.

"Tesla applied for the trademark in October 2024 on the same day that it revealed the Cybercab."

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

OK that sounds like a somewhat weird decision. Considering we Have things like Microsoft "Windows", and "Exastore" which are both 100% generic words.

Also "X" is generic, and so is SpaceX and XAI.
Of all of these it seems both Robotaxi and Cybercap are less generic???

Still why didn't they apply for trademark years ago, since Tesla has been planning on this for years?

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Generic in context.

Giving Tesla those trademarks would mean nobody else can call theirs using those terms. Giving both could mean they might argue the terms robocab and cybertaxi were too close and confusing too. But they are all terms we already use for that type of a vehicle.
We didn't call operating systems windows before windows, and we (mostly) still don't.

Also the trademark for X is like the trademark for Apple, very narrow in scope. You could start and trademark X as your own pretty much as long as it's something that isn't like Twitter.
And many already do exist (and did before musks X)