I read many comments on how PeerTube isn't sustainable as a YouTube alternative and, while it's certainly true right now, are we sure it will be the same in the near future?

The platform is growing and the new mobile app is making great progress; I can certainly see some people investing in a major instance some day, accelerating the platform adoption.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Then again, maybe there are ways to make that burden smaller.

Yes: encode on lower resolutions.

Most of the videos on Youtube don't ever need to be 4K. They don't even need to be 1080p. Heck, most don't even need 720p! Things like music videos, where what's important is the music, orthings like old TV broadcasts or play rips of old consoles, where the source barely gets to 360p, can be encoded to 360p or even 244p without any suffering (I played Monster Hunter on the 3DS for years and I can attest 244p can do great works of magic).

This mixes wonderfully with Peertube's idea about hosting your own instance. If you are hosting your own video storage, you'll want to maximize the amount of stuff you can throw into it. If someone complains that your videos aren't 1080p, tell them to go to /donate.php and do their part.

[–] ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

How does the p2p work? I thought there was a bittorrent-like aspect to it but what you're describing sounds different.

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 2 points 11 hours ago

If multiple people are watching the same video, at the same resolution, it uses WebRTC (HLS P2P) to share data between them, saving bandwidth from the PeerTube instance.

A PeerTube instance can also function as a peer (seed) for another PeerTube instance.