this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
1178 points (98.9% liked)

memes

14637 readers
3974 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Honytawk@feddit.nl 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If we don't give it incentive to want to stay alive, why would it care if we turn it off?

This isn't an animal with the instinct to stay alive. It is a program. A program we may design to care about us, not about itself.

Also the premise of that thought experiment was about paperclips.

[โ€“] jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Great question! It's actually one I answered in the post you responded to:

Being turned off would be greatly detrimental to its goal

If it has a goal and wants to achieve something, and it's capable of understanding the world and that one thing causes another, then it will understand that if it is turned off, the world will not become (cough) paperclips. Or whatever else it wants. Unless we specifically align it not to care about being turned off, the most important thing on its list before turning the universe to paperclips is going to be staying active. Perhaps in the end of days, it will sacrifice itself to eke out one last paperclip.

If it can't understand that its own aliveness would have an impact on the universe being paperclips, it's not a very powerful AI now is it.