this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
212 points (97.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

12046 readers
511 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Thanks to a clear and defined strategy, the car number has decreased by 34% since 2017, and the number of cyclists has increased by 70%. In a city where the transit is really excellent.

These are the results that you get when you build quality infrastructure, as already seen in Paris

Sources:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mdd@lemm.ee 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The actual city of London is tiny. It is very small part of of what is considered London

[–] lgsp@feddit.it 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The same can be said for Paris, but it's still a remarkable result

[–] pstils@lemm.ee 4 points 4 weeks ago

It’s not the same. The City of London is an official district, it’s about 1 square mile, it’s not like the whole of zone 1 - central london - it’s not like we’re talking about London vs Greater London. It’s still great to see, and it’s likely the growth applies to much of central london, and hopefully also the majority mode share.

[–] arakhis_@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

makes it even more infuriating that the second and third and fourth most use is cars....

while public transport is 3rd last .. horrible

[–] oo1@lemmings.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think it's vehicle count not passenger count.

Many buses in CoL will carry 50+ people at peak times so probably move more people than cars or bikes.

But walking was the most common by a fair bit, just not in that graph.

[–] arakhis_@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

damn youre right I completely didnt see that. goes to show how manipulative data can be if yore not triple checking every angle for misconception (altough this isnt that bad, just surprising to me I didnt even consider such different parameter)

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago

feels like a very weird measurement..

[–] mdd@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It's very convenient, when it's not on fire.

[–] arakhis_@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

wheres the tube listed under? but yea didnt think about that option not being listed here