this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
934 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

69971 readers
2363 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
934
Paul McCartney and Dua Lipa urge UK Prime Minister to rethink his AI copyright plans. A new law could soon allow AI companies to use copyrighted material without permission. (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by dwazou@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
318 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pirrrrrrrr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh are we giving AI the same rights as humans now? On what grounds?

[–] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I never claimed that in this case. As I said in my response: There have been won lawsuits that machines are allowed to index and analyze copyrighted material without infringing on such rights, so long as they only extract objective information, such as what AI typically extracts. I'm not a lawyer, and your jurisdiction may differ, but this page has a good overview: https://blog.apify.com/is-web-scraping-legal/

EDIT: For the US description on that page, it mentions the US case that I referred to: Author's Guild v Google

[–] bufalo1973@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You might not remember but decades ago Microsoft was almost split in two. But then it came to pass that George Bush "won" the elections. And the case was dismissed.

In the US justice system, money talks.

[–] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh I agree money talks in the US justice system, but as the page shows, these laws also exist elsewhere, such as in the EU. And even if I or you don't agree with them, they are still the case law that determines the legality of these things. For me that aligns with my ethical stance as well, but probably not yours.

[–] bufalo1973@lemm.ee 1 points 20 hours ago

I know they exist outside the US. I'm European. But there are too many terms of use that say that in case of problems they go to courts in the US that they will do everything on their hand to do the sameifn this case.