this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
474 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1864 readers
122 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dgerard@awful.systems 18 points 4 days ago (4 children)

why is no-one demanding to know why the robot is so sexay

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sorry for being late, busy wanking off to the sexy robot in the article. So ye, anyway, why'd you do that?

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

to get you into ahem vibe coding

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 5 points 4 days ago

ChatGPT, please tailor my resume and write me a cover letter for all programming positions at teledildonics companies, thanks!

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

ah I do believe I have the link for this

example mvp: hook up your linter/LSP/CI-errors-output to buttplug

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 11 points 4 days ago

Hi hi please explain my boner

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't know what this has to do with this thread, but maybe ask Hajime Sorayama, he kind of came up with the whole concept of sexy robots.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 6 points 4 days ago

Quantity has a quality all its own

Boom steelmanned

[–] luciole@beehaw.org 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

not super into cyber facehugger tbh

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 7 points 4 days ago

as long as you don’t yuck my yum we good

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 9 points 4 days ago

but look how delighted they are!