Asklemmy

48007 readers

748 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

-17

Would you be okay with AI users? (lemmy.kde.social)

submitted 9 hours ago by Brahvim@lemmy.kde.social to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

If Lemmy had a few LLM-powered accounts for fun and not spam, would you like to interact with them?
I don't recall seeing even a classic utility bot on Lemmy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Alice@beehaw.org 3 points 6 hours ago

Nah. I'm not 100% against it, some are fun or useful in concept, but I'm here to talk to people, and threads littered with grammar corrections and Sokka haikus get old.

If there was an effective vetting process for useful bots, eg the repost sleuth bot, that'd be nice. But the "good bot"/"bad bot" voting system just became its own form of spam.