Memes

50323 readers

832 users here now

Rules:

Be civil and nice.
Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml

sexy_peach@feddit.de

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

747

So anyway (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 days ago by hamid@vegantheoryclub.org to c/memes@lemmy.ml

113 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think it represents a timely reminder that we now know those who scream the loudest about the 2A, and how we can't do a damn thing about gun violence because it would erode their freedoms, have no interest in using it the way they've always proclaimed they must, as long as the right people are being hurt.

And I'm not actually anti-2A so much as I am anti-a-particular-sort-of-gun-enthusiast.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not keen on the 2A, based on it's original purpose and use. I am, however, pro "Under no pretext shall arms and ammunition be surrendered, and any attempts to do should be frustrated, by force, if necessary."

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am not arguing in any way for disarmament. But the fact that's all anyone seems to think I'm saying is kind of proving my point.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah, I was only replying to the part about you not being a 2a supporter, showing you dont have to be, in order to support an armed working class 😀

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

All good, I get it now!