this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
247 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

70107 readers
2270 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Devagiri admitted to working with others in 2020 and 2021 to cause DoorDash to pay for deliveries that never occurred. At the time, Devagiri was a delivery driver for DoorDash orders. Under the scheme, Devagiri used customer accounts to place high value orders and then, using an employee’s credentials to gain access to DoorDash software, manually reassigned DoorDash orders to driver accounts that he and others controlled. Devagiri then caused the fraudulent driver accounts to report that the orders had been delivered, when they had not, and manipulated DoorDash’s computer systems to prompt DoorDash to pay the fraudulent driver accounts for the non-existent deliveries. Devagiri would then use DoorDash software to change the orders from “delivered” status to “in process” status and manually reassign the orders to driver accounts he and others controlled, beginning the process again. This procedure usually took less than five minutes, and was repeated hundreds of times for many of the orders.

The scheme resulted in fraudulent payments exceeding $2.5 million.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think doordash lets you use a VPN.

Many platforms that deal with finance would reject an order when they detect VPNs or Tor (since that's what fraudsters and scammers use), or they ask for additional verification (like SMS) to verify you are in fact the account holder. So they probably were just using their real IP address.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well in this case a proxy isn't a VPN, but an intermediate the criminal has taken control of. A proxy does not have to be legitimate.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

True, but again, you're making a lot of assumptions here. I don't see anything about proxies anywhere.

He probably got caught because of an internal audit, that's the assumption I would make.