Selfhosted

46672 readers

801 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

My first seccam, now the Frigate mystery in LXC (lemmy.ml)

submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by trilobite@lemmy.ml to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Just got my first security camera, a Hikvision multi focal 4MP. I got Proxmox up and running and installed Frigate through the community LXC repository on github. Most of the documentation is to first install Docker as LXC and then Frigate as a normal docker compose yml, where all the configuration is done. Now that I've skipped the docker bit, how do i config my camera on frigate? From reading the frigate website, i need access to config file. I also need to tell frigate to save all streaming on my Truenas that I've shared with Proxmox via a NFS share. Anyone have a similar setup? These LXC containers seem pretty cool as concept, as from what I understand, they're similar to a bare metal install except the host shares its kernel and they bring the convienence of containerisation. Basically, LXC and Docker are similar in concept but with Docker you have the benefit of compose and portainer which are universal whereas LXC is part of Proxmox. Is that a fair summary?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] trilobite@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ok, I hadn't realised that the helper script installs docker. I thought LXC was an alternative to docker.

Regarding the VM option, I did think of doing just that but read a lot about it using too many resources with frigate and LXC seems to be more efficient option when it comes to resources

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.snekerpimp.space 1 points 2 days ago

With one low res camera I ran it in a Debian vm with 4gb of Ram and two cores no problem. Once I had three 4K streams, I bumped it up to 16gb and 10 cores, only cause I wanted a hi-res live view, but I’m sure it would do fine with less with low res live view. Have been running it in a vm for two years now, no issues. Tried a bare metal install and lxc. Keep coming back to vm for the adaptability. Adding GPU and npu through lxc always made issues for me, but passing through to a vm is pretty well supported and documented, I think the ease of use outweighs the additional resources used by the vm. Plus I have read it’s not best practice to run docker inside an lxc.