this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
736 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

70916 readers
3421 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
736
The Windows Subsystem for Linux is now open source. (blogs.windows.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world
187 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Today we’re very excited to announce the open-source release of the Windows Subsystem for Linux. This is the result of a multiyear effort to prepare for this, and a great closure to the first ever issue raised on the Microsoft/WSL repo:

https://github.com/microsoft/WSL

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

I don't understand this.

Does this mean Windows programs and exe files will now run natively on linux?

Edit: unclear why someone asking a question gets a 50/50 downvote to upvote response....

"OOOOHHHH!!!!! THIS GUY DOESN'T KNOW ALL THE THINGS I KNOW!!!! BOOOOO!!!!!"

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 8 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, as long as your Linux distro is Windows.

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

In my view it's a Linux subsystem for Windows.

Why the name is the other way around, I'll never understand.

[–] 3abas@lemm.ee 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The original WSL doesn't use the Linux kernel at all, it's a Windows Subsystem for compatibility with Linux. WSL2 actually visualizes a complete Linux kernel, but the name stuck.

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 0 points 2 weeks ago

The original WSL DOES use the Linux kernel. Which runs as a native NT process (there's a huge difference between NT and Win32 processes). But porting a Linux kernel into the NT binary is a maintenance nightmare, it's much easier to run the original in a slim VM.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 4 points 2 weeks ago

It's a windows subsystem, and it runs linux.

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 3 points 2 weeks ago

Windows subsystem for (running) linux?

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I guess the logic is that it's a subsystem of Windows for the purpose of running Linux apps.

Agree though that it's a confusing name. I remember thinking the same thing about Windows Subsystem for Android (the compatibility layer to run Android apps in Windows)

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah the naming is absurdly stupid. Its a linux subsystem that is part of windows nowadays. Its so people on windows can get access to a proper terminal interface.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

[Windows subsystem] for [executable environment] is the naming scheme. The default is Win32, there's one for POSIX (practically never used), and Linux runs in another.

https://stackoverflow.com/a/41409419

[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Windows has a terminal interface already!

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

that thing is a glorified childs toy tho

[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Why do you say that

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 2 weeks ago

You’re going to have to explain your reasoning here.