this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
234 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

70163 readers
3516 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Four months ago, we asked Are LLMs making Stack Overflow irrelevant? Data at the time suggested that the answer is likely "yes:"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Never again will I help provide content to a VC-backed service just so that they can rugpull us and cash-out.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 11 points 1 day ago

That's why people should be posting on fedi and never post on corporate web.

When corporate tells you its a parasite, believe it

[–] vermaterc@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What exactly do you accuse Stack Overflow for? As far as I know this service has always been free to use and data is easily downloadable.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Free to use" on a VC-backed service just means you're the product. I am accusing them of the same thing I'm accusing each VC-backed service: That they exploit our efforts to cash out and then sell the service for someone who will enshittify it for profit.

Also, what do you mean "easily downloadable"? Can anyone download the entire corpus of SO in a way that they could set up their own SO with the same content to bootstrap them?

[–] vermaterc@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also, what do you mean “easily downloadable”? Can anyone download the entire corpus of SO in a way that they could set up their own SO with the same content to bootstrap them?

have you seen: https://archive.org/details/stackexchange

That they exploit our efforts to cash out and then sell the service for someone who will enshittify it for profit.

Can you give an example of this enshittification for profit?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can you give an example of this enshittification for profit?

reddit.com

[–] vermaterc@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So I agree, I thought you are talking about some profit enshittification on Stack Overflow

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago

I'm not following SO practices, but I it will come for it as well. It's inevitable. Those who paid billions for it will require a ROI

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I live in the hope that the insightful comments I left on reddit over my long tenure there will eventually be part of a FOSS corpus, once the VCs can't extract anything of competitive value from it anymore. I'll be long dead, but my comments will live on.

[–] isaakengineer@programming.dev 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

for a life of mine, I can't understand why people don't value knowledge enough to make their own website and be proud of it; PS. I have made a load of CMS and now working on new approach to web dev ...

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 5 points 21 hours ago

Because it won't be used and won't be seen, that's the sad reality of it. I do host a small personal blog run of org-mode+hugo, but it gets less visitors than a library at midnight