this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
1109 points (97.6% liked)
Greentext
6246 readers
569 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I calculated this a few years ago, but It shouldnt've changed much. Take the year 1960 or whichever year that you can get all the following reliable information: Minimum wage, and median two bed house cost/sale price, for the specific area or state.
The minimum wage in my area in 1955 was equivalent to double what it is now, and with the housing market (and omitting tax because it's too dynamic) minimum wage then was enough to earn a house's value in four years. To earn the equivalent house's value before tax in the next four years, in my area, minimum wage must more than treble to $45/h. (to get $360,000)
Graphing the min wage with house costs between 1955, 1985 and 2015 shows an exponentially increasing slope which, if no market crash happens, will continue. As it is, factoring the cost of living and taxes, it would take over 100 years to buy a house on $15/h.