this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
130 points (89.2% liked)

Greentext

6335 readers
1036 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

do they really though? i saw some on slsk but i was like

wha

[–] ma1w4re@lemm.ee 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Half of my library is encoded with libopus, it compresses better and retains quality at lower bitrates. The other half is not opus yet because I can't be bothered to hunt for flacs to convert, since lossy->lossy conversion degrades the data..

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Okay but lossless to lossy also degrades the quality.

[–] ma1w4re@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Picture this: You take a sheet of pristine A4 paper (lossless), you crumple it up to reduce size (mp3), then you attempt to uncrumple it and carefully fold it to reduce size (opus). Your sheet still has that uneven texture due tu crumpling. Or, you take the pristine sheet, and just carefully fold it multiple times. In both cases it is deformed and can never be lossless again, but folded paper still has more quality, and takes less space.