this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
694 points (99.0% liked)

memes

15075 readers
4425 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] weird@sub.wetshaving.social 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Isn't it when ui/ux uses deceptive practices to confuse the user into doing something?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Yes. It's when the UI leads YOU to do the thing you don't want. So unless the banner telling you that the site uses cookies is doing something to make you accept them when you don't want to accept them (such as by not having a button to not accept them visible) having cookies itself isn't a dark pattern.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is... exactly what most sites do with their consent banners.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Most sites I've visited since they had to disclose their use of cookies have clearly visible "accept all" and "reject all" buttons, along with a "more information" button that often lets you configure what cookies you want and what you don't.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You must be visiting much more upstanding sites than I do! 😆

For those still curious, here's an article with some examples of dark patterns.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

Given that cookies are just one of many ways you can be tracked on the web, isn't the who cookie banner thing kind of pointless to begin with? You can be identified by the fonts on your system, browser size, add-ons, and canvas fingerprint, WebGL fingerprint, screen resolution, time zone offset, hardware specs, what peripherals are plugged-in... It goes on and on.

We don't need tracking cookie banners, we need tracking everything banners.