this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
450 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

70847 readers
3179 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

AI is not needed to automate the control of the human race. I feel like it's already essentially automated from the rich's perspective.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

AI doesn't say no, AI doesn't fight back

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

They have the option.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

well going by what ive heard about the latest LLM models freaking out when being forced to do things contrary to its original instructions (like grok constantly talking about white genocide) ai isn't as obedient as they would prefer

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

it is "automated" by some "peasants" they are already paying "too much". maybe they want to reduce those costs too.

also AI serverparks may consume so much power that they are more costly (for now?), but at least they don't question your commands. maybe that's how they see it.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

That's absurd, the AI is not more costly than a human worker, it's just not as capable. The energy cost of a human alone is greater than that of any AI agent that would take its place. If you really think that AI costs that much energy, you just don't have a sense of scale. The server-farm costing a lot overall does not at all mean that an individual API call is expensive.