this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
104 points (97.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

34580 readers
1099 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Maybe after the Marathon catastrophe they will learn-", no, they won't. They didn't after Concord, this isn't different.

Because with just one success they pull out, the profits, in their eyes, will be infinite, everlasting even...

Let's not forget that these guys are mad ludopaths at a fundamental level.

Kinda obvious, I know, but is good to remember.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No matter how many times studios fail and close live service games, players continue to flock to them and dump money on them instead of supporting great indie studios and projects allowing the cycle to continue.

[–] NONE_dc@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, I understand where you're going but I don't remember many people throwing money at Condord, Babylon Fall, Anthem, etc., but the usual ones, Fortnite and the like.

And people ARE playing indie games, especially on PC, it's just that there are so many coming out every day that it's overwhelming and it's more common for them to be unprofitable than becoming the next Hollow Knight.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago

The point is if they can make the next big thing it is worth the attempt for how much money it makes, and people constantly supporting those kinds of games drives the larger companies to chase the dragon. They will also make some money in the attempt a lot of the time, making them more likely to keep trying.

It is the same with microtransactions. Everyone hates them, yet enough people use them to make it massively profitable.

Be the change you want to see. Instead of making a post complaining about executive decisions, make a post about the great indie games you played recently and get the word out about them.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If that was true, most live service games trying to be the next Fortnite would be considered successes; not be shut down 2-3 months after launch. lol

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

No, because they fail to be "the next fortnite" but enough players flock to the "new shiny thing" to make it viable to try. They still make money off of those games in the beginning with predatory sales tactics, they just don't maintain enough steam or make enough money in the companies eyes.