this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
224 points (99.6% liked)

Hacker News

1557 readers
189 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lundi@piefed.social 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Here a table info with others non-STEM degrees unemployement rate: Labor Market Outcomes of College Graduates by Major ^.xlsx

It's from the same source as the OP's article (The New York Fed), you'll see it says last updated in 2025 but if you scroll down you'll see them mentioning it to be 2023 data which is what the article was based on too

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 days ago

Thanks, that was what I was looking for, but I missed the source data. That table also adds in an underemployment rate, which is a good reference too I think. Many of the degrees with the worst unemployment rates also have very high underemployment rates, meaning that many of the people in those degrees who do have jobs are only finding part time work or are stuck with jobs that don't meet their qualifications.

While computer science/engineering does have a high unemployment rate, it's underemployment rate is far better than the surrounding degrees. Taking that into consideration does make it seem like a better career than just the unemployment rate would suggest.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

bio is middle of it, probably because most of them are in health, instead of research and biotech.3%, i wonder if they seperate the 2 biotech might be a higher unemployment, because i noticed that people often cant find a job most of the time, because of the significant amount of experience required+ grad degree if applicable.