this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
397 points (97.8% liked)

Not The Onion

16575 readers
1059 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/30703278

Those seeking a job in the federal government will now have to write an essay in support of Donald Trump's executive orders, according to a memo from the Office of Personnel Management.

Vince Haley, the White House's head of domestic policy, wrote in the May 29 memorandum that all civil service applicants must answer a series of essays as part of the job recruitment process, including one about how they would "help advance" Trump's policy priorities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 86 points 4 days ago (4 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 85 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Probably, but we're way past the point of the Trump regime ignoring all laws that disagree with it..

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

I'm still waiting for all the promises that USanians kept saying over the years that guns would save them all...

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 23 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The courts have been telling him no for the most part. They just take awhile because they actually follow the law.

[–] dan@upvote.au 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Is Trump actually following what the courts say though?

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

if its coming from putin he will. otherwise he ignores it.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago

When the BBB passes it will be illegal for courts to enforce the law

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No but see if i keep the right details about the room in my minds eye, and point my magic hammer at my enemy, and chant the laws just right, they have to do it. Or you shoot a fireball.

Thats why you keep your focus the fringe on the flag; that keeps you firmly in earth magic; if you get distracted and think about the benches while chanting the law youre gonna do either fire or wood magic, and you do not want to accidentally summon a tree in a court room. Especially not if youre citing a powerful law when you do.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If I had a dollar for each time I've had an excellent ratio decidendi argument ruined by the sudden appearance of a fucking weeping willow, I'd have enough for a Costco hot dog!

(The second time, I managed to work it into my closing statement with some difficulty)

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh shit, i guess they'll stop then.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago

Phew, we almost had a disaster!

[–] irish_link@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Not a lawyer but I actually don’t think so.

I assume all government figures never thought this kind of act could ever happen here so they had no reason to make a law about it or one that covers it.

P.S. Even if it is, who is going to stop them. They haven’t followed any law they don’t want to unless forced by the courts and even then they still do it.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I'd expect there's applicable laws concerning discrimination in hiring practices. It's probably not a legal stretch to argue that mandating idealogical support for one party's policies will run afoul of political discrimination laws. In fact, this might generate a bunch of lawsuits from people who get turned down for jobs.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

Political affiliation is not a protected class, it’s not illegal to discriminate against you for who you vote for

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If it is illegal a judge will stop it. Just because he sprays and prays doesn't mean it's sticking.

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If it is illegal a judge will stop it.

Someone would have to bring a legal case to them first, right? And even if they did, a SC Judge can overturn that.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 4 days ago

And even if they did, a SC Judge can overturn that.

Easy solution: Don't use a South Carolina judge. 😌 ^/s^

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago

I don't think so

Dumb? Yes but not illegal