this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
620 points (99.1% liked)

People Twitter

7459 readers
1263 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interestingly I (and many others) have noticed that the no name (and other store brands) are often better then the "name" brand stuff.

For example I would say KD is worse then store brand, and the store brand crackers are waaaay better then the name brand now (they seem to now over toast them).

[–] prex@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Perhaps they're not as up to date with their enshitification.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe, I also talked years ago to some people higher up at loblaws (at their regional HQ for work) and asked about no name and presidents choice and I was lead to believe a lot of work goes into making the product good. They also talked about how they make more on the store brand and see this as an opportunity to push more people to their stuff. I don't think anyone really likes the big brands these days.