this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
74 points (92.0% liked)
Asklemmy
48946 readers
384 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
the mensa paradox.
people smart enough to get in, are smart enough to know it's not worth it
Also, "smart" and high IQ are different things.
There's no way to objectively measure how "smart" someone is, but if you think the bogus test and bogus score developed by eugenic pseudoscientists looking for an excuse to prevent the untermensch from breeding is the objective measure, you are in fact stupid.
i think IQ tests were originally developed to see which school students never to go to the next class, or stay behind, it was meant to see if a student tests as his peers or as his next/previous class peers. the inventor never intended it to be used as a way to measure an intrinsic immutable trait on adults.
https://share.google/TOOJM3X81hSIP0PvP
it was seriously bastardised by racist pseudoscience.
Groucho Marx couldn't have said it better. Oh .. wait.
saying it with his voice is much better
however,
some things are better said in Groucho's voice the rest are better said in Harpo's voice.
It was actually a (too oblique) reference to his: I wouldn't join a club that would have me as a member quotation. It was too oblique; my bad.
Bingo. What's more insufferable than a person whose life revolves around lauding their own achievements? A room full of them.
And yet it exists. Ego might seem like a pretty useless motivator, but it doesn't seems to anticorrelate with intelligence. If anything, it correlates, probably because when you're "the smart one" it becomes a vicious cycle pretty easily.
it exist, but it's like really small.
I'm theory, 2% of the world population is eligible (not that exclusive) yet they only have 50,000 members in the US, ie, 1.4 in every 10,000 people.
so the vast majority of "smart" people think the idea is cringe
I mean, it is cringe. There's strong norms about modesty when it comes to intelligence for a reason.
So that comes out to 0.7% of eligible people. Honestly that's pitiful if it comes with discounts like other people are suggesting. Those meetings must be really obnoxious.
I want to believe, that the eligible people who join are mostly doing it because there's no way anyone would join, so they just want to know what tf is going on, then discover that everyone there had the same reason, then they go for a pint to talk how stupid and comical it is.
maybe there's a perfect point where you're smart enough to hit that 15% hotel discount
Yeah, I'm reconsidering now that someone mentioned that. I'm not going to the meets, though, they get bad reviews for exactly this reason.
Edit: Uhh, looks like it's only the US Mensa? Maybe some of the other Mensa-like things have benefits beyond the "pleasure" of their company, I don't know.