this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
1087 points (99.6% liked)

Progressive Politics

2927 readers
271 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Words matter.

You aren't writing an academic paper. Always use simple direct language.

  • Help the poor
  • Healthcare for everyone
  • Good treatment at work.

Don't use complex words.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 150 points 3 days ago (3 children)

One of many lasting “gifts” of Reagan.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 52 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We’ve got to get all those ~~welfare queens~~ 25 year old males playing video games back to work! They’re getting a free ride that they don’t deserve. People only have value when they are working!

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 29 points 3 days ago

He started that evil welfare queen idea back in California. It gained traction there so he continued to use it on the national side.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

dont you love the misogyny in that "queens" label? because who makes a better scapegoat than black mothers?

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Currently? Mexicans and Middle easterners, it would seem. They’re all criminals and rapists apparently.

/s

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Wym? Just a few more decades, and the trickling down will surely start. I can already taste it on their boots

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Paula_Tejando@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not. I much rather he lived forever. Forever wasting away, seeing his loved ones perish, losing his sanity little by ever so fucking little, inhabiting a hell all of his own.

[–] Madagaskar_sky@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Paula_Tejando@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think it's healthy to dehumanize our villains. He probably had loved ones. You don't need to be a monster to do monstrous things. All humans have that capability within, you and me included.

It's like that famous answer to "what stops you from murdering and raping?" “Nothing, I rape and murder as much as I want, which is zero."

[–] Madagaskar_sky@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I agree. We shouldn't demonize our opponents.

Humans can be monsters, but there are different kinds of monsters too. One special group is the psychopaths.

I believe Regan was one, and I think he saw relationships as transactional.

OK, maybe he wasn't, let's assume. But he gladly saw to massive swathes of destruction of American people because he did not see them as humans. If someone can be that callous with human lives, I can think and call him a monster. Because, how can you tell the difference?