this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
419 points (98.8% liked)

196

18004 readers
213 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Signatures threshold has been met! -Edit: Per comments below, we still need more (valid unique EU citizen) signatures, as the aim is for 150% to make up for possible bot signatures.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It doesn’t really screw them over much. They made lots of money before they started doing this BS. They’ll make lots of money after they start complying with it. It’s just them being dumb.

An older game may not sell as well as a new one but a dead game doesn’t sell anything.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Dead games don't keep players hooked on it. Players who are playing an old game, are not buying new games. If you kill the old game, the players are forced to buy your new game.

I think that's their intention.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I’m a retro gamer. Old games are not dead games unless it’s no longer possible to play them.

Look at Nintendo. They’re still selling the VS arcade version of SMB1 from 1986!

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Also there's the obvious: having all players validate against a service kills piracy and makes their usage trackable, but after a while the subscription profits shrink as players move on, and now the company is only getting 10x the maintenance costs covered by subscriptions.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah, no. Why would i pay anything for a more than 10 years old game that was dropped by the developers long ago? They make the main money in the first few months anyway, the rest in the following two years.