this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
115 points (100.0% liked)
Progressive Politics
3042 readers
266 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Other . . people?
I think it is likely that the implied compromises would be made with the capital class, not the working class. That's the distinction I was aiming for and deriding. In keeping with that line of thought: if corporations are people, then I suppose yes, other people.
I'm sure he'll find there's compromises to be made at any level. Sure, capital class which - for a mayor I guess - would be the high-dollar contractors and consultants the city pays, but also the neighborhood groups and the food service groups and so on. You can piss off some of them but not all the time, and you can't piss off all of them any time.
I have no issue with that take, and I agree with you there.
I may have an unfairly uncharitable view, but that's not what I believe he meant. If he did, I would withdraw my smarm.