this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
1520 points (99.2% liked)

Luigi Mangione

2309 readers
401 users here now

A community to post anything related to Luigi Mangione.

This is not a pro-murder community. Please respect Lemmy.world ToS.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So, in the second example, I realise those people didn't get the death penalty, but were they also eligible for it?

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The line seems to be drawn at choosing whether to charge the murder at a state or federal level. In Luigi's case, he is being tried federally.

Which asks the question as to why Luigi's case is being tried federally while mass casualty/terrorism crimes are only being charged at the state level.

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 12 points 1 week ago

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in the state of Florida. And based on the Wikipedia link, Parkland could have qualified based on: 3. The defendant knowingly created a great risk of death to many persons.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because he crossed state lines to escape I guess?

[–] kayohtie@pawb.social 9 points 1 week ago

It's an excuse given that is a piss poor reasoning overall.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think texas has a death penalty for capital murder, which begins at two or more murders done at the same time. That means the el paso shooter could have gotten it. Xorollo pointed out the florida possibility.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

So, they're comparing someone who could have gotten the death penalty but didn't, to someone who could get the death penalty but likely won't?