this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
1486 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

15991 readers
1461 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] procrastitron@lemmy.world 331 points 6 days ago (7 children)

I took a physics course at a community college over 20 years ago and one of the things that stood out to me was the professor telling us not to overthink or assign too much romanticism to the idea of black holes.

His message was basically “it just means the escape velocity is greater than the speed of light… if you plug the size and mass of the universe into the escape velocity formula, the result you get back is greater than the speed of light, so our entire universe is a black hole.”

If this was being discussed at a community college decades ago then I think the new discoveries aren’t as revelatory as they would at first appear to the general public.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 109 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Nah really it was probably some small thing the media got a hold of and just ran with. I think you're spot on

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 113 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)
[–] msage@programming.dev 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Your SMBC link doesn't work for me, it just opens the index.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] xorollo@leminal.space 13 points 6 days ago

Works now! Thanks, and very relevant.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Smbc is Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal, but what does xkcd stand for?

[–] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Xaturday Korning Creakfast Dereal

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Xerry kible cellow dip

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

It's a random unique string, chosen to make the comic easily searchable.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

On the contrary; while I have heard the explanation that the commenter you replied to has said I have also heard a slightly different theory:

Our universe is the 3 dimensional event horizon of a 4th dimensional black hole. By extension we may find that black holes in our universe have similar funky 2 dimensional areas at their even horizons.

I am sure clickbait articles are part of it but there also seems to be several actual theories surrounding the idea of the nature of our universe relating to black holes.

[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (7 children)
[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago (14 children)

3+1, not 4D (we cannot move freely in time). They're referencing the holographic universe theory, or holographic principle. PBS Spacetime has a good episode on the holographic universe theory.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

YOU can't move freely in time. Don't speak for me.

Ok, I can't either. But still...

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 11 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I think I can move freely in time, just not voluntarily...

Sometimes I go through a whole day in like a minute, sometimes I blink and it's Monday already.

Or maybe it's working nights has that effect?

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So, I can freely move through time if I consider alcohol as my time machine.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

That’s more skipping forward in time, but then slowing down time when you come to the next day.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago

Freely means both directions, not just different speeds in one direction.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] vala@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Nah, this universe is 3d.

I'm assuming you are thinking that time is the 4th dimension and we have time here so we are 4d?

Time may be the 4th dimension, but in our universe, time doesn't actually behave like a proper dimension. For one thing, dimensions should be spatially perpendicular to each other and time is not. We also seem to only be able to move one way through time whereas we can move back and forth through the other 3 dimensions.

Dimensions get weird and complicated. For the intents and purposes of this conversation it's correct to say that the universe were experiencing now is 3 dimensional.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Three spacial dimensions, which is normally what people mean when they say that, unless they specify otherwise. For example, we call them 3D game engines, not 4D. Yes, there's also a time dimension that is special. It cannot be moved through freely.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 64 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Scientist: Scientific discoveries are meaningless when taken out of context.

Journalist: Scientific discoveries are meaningless.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Context is text that served time in prison.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It balances out protext, figure it out rookie

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 50 points 6 days ago (2 children)

another thing I learned at some point: Just because a physics formula returns a result, doesn't mean that it's reality

TBF black holes themselves were originally just the result of a Physics formula, but they eventually turned out to be a "reality". Sometimes that shit happens, yo.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago

Iff the rules of physics are accurate then it does, but we don't know that they are. In fact, we're pretty sure we're missing some things. See: The Crisis in Cosmology.

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Orr, you’re missing the obvious alternative here - the guy was a legendary level scientist, but the government stole his research and threatened his family and sidelined him into being a community college professor so that no one pays attention to his “drivel” so that they continue to control us into being workers for the capitalist pigs

[–] pishadoot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

I mean, the model was first developed in the 70s so maybe not that specific guy

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_cosmology

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

When I first saw pictures of galaxies as a kid I noticed they all looked like black holes.

In a way we're all just bits of organic matter mid-flush, waiting for the Drainpipe of Destiny

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

In a way we're all just bits of organic matter mid-flush, waiting for the Drainpipe of Destiny

Word

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Theory is one thing.
Observation is the next step.

[–] procrastitron@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Absolutely. I don’t want to minimize the importance of the new discoveries in any way; I’m just saying this isn’t the great surprise the original post seems to think it is.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Interestingly, galaxies at the edge of our ability to perceive are in fact receding away from us at velocities greater than the speed of light.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Maybe it’s because they are outside the black hole and aren’t time dilated.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Wouldn't that mean if we can see them that light can enter/escape a black hole?

[–] procrastitron@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Entering and escaping are two wildly different things.

It can enter, but not escape.

[–] Brisket@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So that's what Hotel California was about all along?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Light can enter a black hole perfectly fine - we would be able to see things outside of it, because the light is still following us. No light leaves the black hole (if it's past the event horizon), so you can't see into it.