this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
582 points (84.6% liked)

Memes

52702 readers
873 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 191 points 1 month ago (26 children)

Fun fact: It's actually possible for two countries to both be authoritarian!

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago (14 children)

The US killed a million innocent people in Iraq just a few years ago, and is *currently * drone bombing several countries in ME and north africa, and is currently supporting the apartheid state of israel with billions of dollars in military aid.

The PRC has not been in a war since its skirmish with Vietnam in 1979.

The US has a network of > 800 military bases across the globe, and has been involved in regime change in nearly every country.

Which one is authoritarian?

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

"They can both be authoritarian"

"WELL USA INVADED IRAQ"

Lmao

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sarothazrom@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Which one is currently genociding Uhygurs? Which one illegally annexed Tibet and Hong Kong? Both countries are authoritarian shit-holes.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

illegally annexed... Hong Kong

what

Like I can get not agreeing with it but illegally annexed how do you expect to be taken even a little seriously

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago

I keep hearing 'illegal war' in the media.

What the fuck is a legal war? A war faught by lawyers?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lol Tibet was still cutting off boys genitals to serve the lamas when china 'invaded'

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

Only one country is genociding muslins.

"illegally annexed" Hong Kong LMAO

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

tibet was never invaded, theocrats lost their slaves and libs are somehow mad about it

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Nope, only one of them is a shithole.

Which one illegally annexed Tibet

I’m pretty sure virtually all of the Tibetan people are happy to no longer be suffering under theocratic feudalism. Happy to no longer be illiterate serfs and slaves, suffering depredation under a god-king. I doubt many of them are sad that CIA asset Dalai “suck my tongue” Lama is in exile. [1] [2]

and Hong Kong?

Entirely legal. In fact it would have been illegal for the UK not to hand it over.

The UK’s 99 year lease to subjugate Hong Kong ended. A lease which had been forced upon Imperial China at gunpoint during the century of humiliation. Hong Kong reintegration after the lease expired was a foregone conclusion. The last minute, US-backed attempt at color revolution failed.

Which one is currently genociding Uhygurs?

Neither, but one of them trained, funded, and organized terrorists in the region, and then made up a genocide narrative, and then imposed illegal sanctions on it using the fabricated genocide narrative as a pretext. Previously.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 15 points 1 month ago

Idk if it's just me, but it's insane to bring up Uhygur genocide, which has not been in the news or mentioned at all for years, while we watch US funded Israel blowing up starving children on a daily basis.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Uighurs

Tibet

Supporting Russia in Ukraine

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 6 points 1 month ago
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (68 children)

"Authoritarian" is largely a meaningless term. All it really means is one group using force against another group, but it doesn't say anything about which group is which. In the US Empire, the capitalists use the state to crush the workers, and export genocide and chaos to the global south. In the PRC, the working class uses the state to keep the capitalists in check as they progress and develop along socialist lines. This stark difference in which class is in power is shown with immense popular support in the PRC:

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (7 children)

In the PRC, the working class uses the state to keep the capitalists in check

The state used the police to crush the working class when they demanded the money from the banks that invested it in a runaway housing scam.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jul/11/china-violent-clashes-at-protest-over-frozen-rural-bank-accounts

You are believing in a fantasy. There are countless countries around the world that are arguably more socialist than China without even calling themselves such. Quite frankly, I trust actions and numbers more than words.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] syzygy@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can you please provide a source for the graphic?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 month ago
load more comments (66 replies)
[–] b_rain@troet.cafe 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
load more comments (22 replies)