United Kingdom
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
view the rest of the comments
I disagree with a lot of what Linehan says but I didn't see his tweets as breaching the theshold for inciting violence. I think a threat needs to have the maker/sender of it claim that they, or those close to them, are credibly about to enact the violence.
The tweet I saw, not sure if it's the one that got him in trouble, was similar to how people put "punch nazis" in their twitter bio. To me, that is non-specific and not a credible threat.
Edit: A better example might be the time actor Liam Neeson told an interviewer an anecdote about how he left his house armed with a club with the intention of committing a racially aggravated hate crime. For some reason he thought it would be a good promo for his new action film? At any rate, the way he described the specifics of what he intended to do seems like a clear example of inciting violence.
Neeson was judged not to have met the threshold for inciting violence despite describing in detail how he planned and attempted to carry out a racially motivated attack. In my opinion that's a more specific incitement to violence than the Linehan tweet because it is specific and credible.
Yes, he throw in a few comments about how he regrets it and won't do it again but we're talking about the contents of a statement as opposed to the context.* I'm not convinced either situations should be considered incitement to violence but the Neeson one seems closer to satisfying the criteria for police intervention.
*The law would consider the statements in isolation, like I can't go on a misogynistic/homophobic/racist rant and then add "just kidding" at the end to escape any repercussions.
It wasn't really framed as a learning experience when he intially brought it up. For some reason he thought it would be an appropriate story to tell to sell his "hard man" credentials as promo for an upcoming action movie role.
Linehan made three separate threats, is already on trial for harassing a trans-rights activist, and is a known anti-trans activist - the context is important, it's not like this is being overblown, a bigot is advocating for violence against a minority group he campaigns against.
Neeson wasn't inciting violence though was he? He wasn't encouraging others to be violent. He was describing an incident in his past which he went on to describe how this behaviour filled him with shame and remorse. It was literally the opposite of inciting violence.